Complaint / review / scam report
Allowed to pay for unnecessary and unused long distance access with a landline.

Complaint / review text:
Back when AT&T took over Pacific Bell, I was advised by Sprint that everyone with a landline had to tie in with a plan for long distance; whether or not they used the long distance service. Believing this to be true, I started making monthly payments for long distance access even though I told Sprint that I would not use such service.

Sprint allowed me to pay an unnecessary fee for long distance access; and I paid in excess of $ 2,000 for many years. Sprint knew I would not need the long distance access because I had a business line for long distance plus cell phones. I never once used the service. They collected unfairly from me with proof that I never once used the long distance access; but they refuse to refund amounts collected over the years.

I have yet to collect a single dime of what they state they will refund. If you have a similar situation with Sprint's long distance access service which started in the mid-1990s; make sure to look into it right away.

Out of $2,000 paid in over the years, Sprint is paying me only $ other words, they are making out like bandits.

JBrown, Los Angeles, CA

Contact information:
Author: Contact with Author

Offender: Sprint

   State: California   City: Los Angeles
Address: KSOPHT0101-Z4300
Phone: 88821147278006396111

Category: Telecommunications


Members, of group Guest, can not leave comments on this publication.
Please register on our website, it will take a few seconds.